• Subscribe
  • Donate Now
  • logo
  • logo
  • Stories
    • Agribusiness
    • Coronavirus
    • Dicamba on Trial
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Government
    • Labor
    • Health
    • Climate Change and Agribusiness
    • Wellness on the Farm
      • Wellness on the Farm
      • Mental health resources in the Midwest
  • Espanol
  • Graphic of the Week
  • Resources
    • Datasets and Documents
    • Reporter Guides
    • Training
  • Send us a tip securely
  • We want your pitches
  • About The Center
  • Donate Now
  • More
    • About The Center
    • Board of Directors
    • User Agreement and Privacy Policy
    • Donor Transparency
    • Editorial Independence Policy
    • Contact Us
Biofuel

BP cuts funding for ‘most promising’ biofuel

By | August 20, 2015
ShareTweet EmailPrint More
  • More on Biofuel
  • Subscribe to Biofuel

With recent major cuts in funding, the future is unclear for cellulosic biofuels, an energy source researchers have called “the most promising” of all biofuels.

Biofuels are an alternative energy source to petroleum fuel and can be produced from corn, oil or plant material. The fuels are appealing to those looking to reduce carbon emissions and decrease reliance on foreign oil.

See also: "Corn ethanol production to stay strong despite federal cuts"

BP backed out of $75 million of its $500 million grant for cellulosic biofuels at the Energy Biosciences Institute – a research institution that employs more than 560 people and partners with professors, graduate students and post docs at the University of California, Berkley and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

The company is exploring options to divest from several components of its cellulosic biofuels business and investments. It will now focus on building the profitability and scale of its sugarcane biofuels business in Brazil and plans to open a biosciences research center in San Diego.

See also: "Advanced biofuels face uncertain future"

“While we believe there is good value in lignocellulosic technology, the current challenging external business environment is resulting in tough strategic choices made by businesses across BP,” Jason Ryan, BP press officer, said in an email.

BP made its announcement about the cuts in December, a bad time for one Energy Biosciences Institute principle investigator.

The BP gas station on Philo Road in Urbana, Ill., on March 5, 2015.

Photo by Darrell Hoemann/Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting

The BP gas station on Philo Road in Urbana, Ill., on March 5, 2015.

“Most frustrating for me was that just before the decision, we were planning pilot-scale demonstrations of two technologies developed with EBI,” Christopher Rao, a principal investigator for the Energy Biosciences Institute at the University of Illinois, said in an email in February.

He added that the demonstrations would have shown BP how their investments were paying off – but that was before the drop in fuel prices.

In a statement, Chris Somerville, director of the Energy Bioscience Institute, said the cellulosic portion, which made up more than half of its research, would “be phased out in a timely manner.”

Susan Jenkins, managing director for EBI said roughly 15 post docs would not get to finish their research on the Berkley campus.

Fuel pumps at an Illinois BP gas station. Under the options, consumers are notified that gas contains up to 10 percent ethanol.

Photo by Darrell Hoemann/Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting

Fuel pumps at an Illinois BP gas station. Under the options, consumers are notified that gas contains up to 10 percent ethanol.

“In my opinion, the decision was entirely due to the drop in gas/oil prices due to fracking (or any other explanation for the price drop), coupled with the weak financial position of BP after the gulf disaster,” Rao said in the email.

BP is facing a maximum fine of $13.7 billion under the Clean Water Act for its 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

The University of Illinois declined to provide information on funding loss for its portion of the partnership.

“What’s needed [for cellulosic biofuels] is a strong, consistent message at the federal level,” Jenkins said. “Without that, it is difficult for industry and corporations to invest heavily if they don’t know what the future holds."


See related stories in our series: "Fields of Fuel"

Thanks to our sponsors

loganfoundation mccormick foundation

Member Of

Member
  • Investigate Midwest
  • About The Center
  • Contact Us
  • Support the Midwest Center

About Investigate Midwest

The Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting is a nonprofit, online newsroom offering investigative and enterprise coverage of agribusiness,big ag and related issues through data analysis, visualizations, in-depth reports and interactive web tools. Learn More »

Search This Site

Browse Archives

© Copyright 2021, Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting

Investigate Midwest is a member of the Institute for Nonprofit News

Built with the Largo WordPress Theme from the Institute for Nonprofit News.

Back to top ↑

The Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Learn More
Privacy & Cookies Policy