America’s most farming-dependent counties overwhelmingly backed President-elect Donald Trump in this year’s election by an average of 77.7%.
Trump has appeared on three presidential ballots, beginning in 2016. In 2020 and 2024, he increased his support nationwide, topping 50% in this year’s popular vote.
However, Trump also increased his support this year among farming-dependent counties by nearly two percentage points compared to 2020.
Farming-dependent counties are defined by the USDA as counties where 25% or more of average annual earnings were derived from farming, or 16% or more of jobs were in farming.
There are 444 counties labeled as farming-dependent, although hundreds more have strong agricultural economic ties. Other county categories include mining, manufacturing, federal/state government, recreation and nonspecialized, which includes counties that aren’t considered dependent on any of the above categories.
Most farming-dependent counties are in the central United States. Trump won the majority of votes in all but 11 of these counties.
Some political observers questioned whether Trump’s support would wane among farmers after his first-term trade war, which led to increased prices and a drop in agricultural exports. During the campaign, Trump promised a return to high tariffs if given a second term.
“His policies didn’t do us any good; his tariffs didn’t do us any good,” Lance Lillibridge, an Iowa farmer, told Investigate Midwest.
Not only did Trump increase his support among farming-dependent counties, but more than 100 of those counties supported him with at least 80% of their vote.
Join us to fuel our investigative journalism.
THE LATEST HEADLINES
Meat consumption grows in US and Asia, while Europe is on the decline
China is investing billions in Latin America, potentially sidelining US farmers for decades to come
Soybeans have been a top US ag export for decades. What happens when the top buyer stops buying?
Recent droughts hit the top cattle counties hardest
Oklahoma’s ban on Chinese-owned farmland made an exception for Smithfield Foods
New WOTUS proposal not a long-term solution to Clean Water Act ambiguities
Factory farms in Iowa generate 110 billion pounds of manure per year. No one tracks where it’s going.
Corn’s clean-energy promise is clashing with its climate footprint
Pesticide drift is catching schools off guard. Lawmakers want to require notice before spraying.
Which states are most exposed as soybean exports falter?
A loophole allows ranchers to renew grazing permits with little scrutiny of environmental impact
A DOJ investigation on beef prices is a red herring
Who really owns your Thanksgiving turkey?
Under new EPA rule, protections would dry up for wetlands across the Mississippi River basin
Trump tried to limit SNAP during the shutdown. Many in his base were eligible.
A legally accepted definition of ultra-processed foods in the US is years away
Fact-checking Trump’s call for an investigation into meatpacking companies
Puerto Rico helped fuel America’s corn boom. Some locals see an unfair arrangement.
It’s time for US petroleum-based food dye usage to, well, die
Farmers were exposed to roughly twice as many pesticides as general population in EU study
Oklahoma officials clash over Tyson pollution case
An explosion of pesticide complaints led to reforms in Illinois. And now, a reporting collapse.
What you should know: Trump’s deportations and the impact on the food system
‘Live Storytelling’ event returns to Iowa City with 5 remarkable speakers
Republish our articles for free, online or in print.
Comments are closed.