America’s most farming-dependent counties overwhelmingly backed President-elect Donald Trump in this year’s election by an average of 77.7%.
Trump has appeared on three presidential ballots, beginning in 2016. In 2020 and 2024, he increased his support nationwide, topping 50% in this year’s popular vote.
However, Trump also increased his support this year among farming-dependent counties by nearly two percentage points compared to 2020.
Farming-dependent counties are defined by the USDA as counties where 25% or more of average annual earnings were derived from farming, or 16% or more of jobs were in farming.
There are 444 counties labeled as farming-dependent, although hundreds more have strong agricultural economic ties. Other county categories include mining, manufacturing, federal/state government, recreation and nonspecialized, which includes counties that aren’t considered dependent on any of the above categories.
Most farming-dependent counties are in the central United States. Trump won the majority of votes in all but 11 of these counties.
Some political observers questioned whether Trump’s support would wane among farmers after his first-term trade war, which led to increased prices and a drop in agricultural exports. During the campaign, Trump promised a return to high tariffs if given a second term.
“His policies didn’t do us any good; his tariffs didn’t do us any good,” Lance Lillibridge, an Iowa farmer, told Investigate Midwest.
Not only did Trump increase his support among farming-dependent counties, but more than 100 of those counties supported him with at least 80% of their vote.
Justices weigh Monsanto’s claim of EPA ‘green light’ for business as usual while Trump’s pro-glyphosate executive order clashes with MAHA’s anti-pesticide push.
The Campaign Legal Center said in a report released Thursday that Brooke Rollins remained close with former employers, which could violate the ethics agreement she signed. The USDA called the allegations ‘frivolous.’
A new federal lobbying report shows the company spent more in early 2026 as the courts consider whether federal pesticide warning labels can protect companies from state lawsuit claims.
We tracked how the collapse of federal rural energy support is ending solar projects across farm country — and costing some developers millions they’ll never get back.
The Illinois legislature is debating whether to become one of a handful of states to legally require worker protections from extreme temperatures. The legislation would apply to labor on the frontlines of the climate crisis, such as farm work.
In late February, the US Department of Agriculture had already predicted food prices in 2026 would increase faster than inflation. A month into the war, some prices will likely skyrocket.
Candidates for Oklahoma governor are spotlighting foreign farmland ownership as a top voter concern, but conflicting claims, carve-outs in state law and gaps in federal data complicate the issue.
A US Supreme Court decision expanding ‘reasonable suspicion’ authority is pushing immigration enforcement beyond job sites into rural towns, where a US citizen says an officer told him: ‘We have the right to assume that you’re an illegal alien.’
Una decisión de la Corte Suprema de EE.UU., que amplía la autoridad de “sospecha razonable”, está llevando la aplicación de las leyes migratorias más allá de los lugares de trabajo hacia los pueblos rurales, donde un ciudadano estadounidense afirma que un agente le dijo: “Tenemos derecho a asumir que usted es un extranjero ilegal”.
Four companies own 85% of US beef production. Independent ranchers say consolidation has narrowed their market options, and past federal antitrust cases have largely ended in fines rather than meaningful changes.
The number of private sector workers declined in states such as Illinois and Minnesota after mass ICE presence, according to an analysis of employment data by UC Merced researchers.
Like this:
LikeLoading...
Type of work:
Explainer A data-driven story that provides background, definition and detail on a specific topic.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print.
Unless otherwise noted, you are allowed to republish our stories, original photos and graphics for free under the following conditions:
You must include a credited byline as published , for example “Author Name, Investigate Midwest.” If your system does not allow it, you instead must include this tag at the top of the story:“This story was originally published on Investigate Midwest”
You must include this tagline and linkback Investigate Midwest is an independent, nonprofit newsroom. Our mission is to serve the public interest by exposing dangerous and costly practices of influential agricultural corporations and institutions through in-depth and data-driven investigative journalism. Visit us online at www.investigatemidwest.org
Please note: Some of our work is funded through grants and fellowships and may be embargoed for republication until a set date. In these instances, we will have a special tagline and byline on our original published piece. If you republish this work, you must include these credits as published. Any work embargoed for republication will be denoted.
Original photos and graphics may be republished with a credited cutline.
It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads, but not ads specifically sold against our stories. You can’t state or imply that donations to your organization support Investigate Midwest’s work.
You can’t sell our material separately or syndicate it.
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You can’t use our work to populate a web site designed to improve rankings on search engines, or solely to gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
You cannot use our work in digital and print publications such as books, ebooks,special editions, data applications and similar material without separate permission.
You may not edit the story content for length, tone or meaning without prior approval. Minor changes for time, location, or editorial style are acceptable.
Questions? Please contact executive director Erin Orr at erin.orr@investigatemidwest.org or audience engagement manager Lauren Cross at lauren.cross@investigatemidwest.org.
GRAPHIC: Trump support grew in America’s top farming counties despite first-term trade war
by Ben Felder, Investigate Midwest, Investigate Midwest November 13, 2024
Ben Felder is Investigate Midwest’s first editor in chief. He was hired in 2023 to cover agribusiness and the meat industry in Oklahoma.
Felder previously worked for The Oklahoman as a political enterprise...
More by Ben Felder, Investigate Midwest
139 replies on “GRAPHIC: Trump support grew in America’s top farming counties despite first-term trade war”
Comments are closed.