• Subscribe
  • Donate Now
  • logo
  • logo
  • Stories
    • Agribusiness
    • Coronavirus
    • Dicamba on Trial
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Government
    • Labor
    • Health
    • Climate Change and Agribusiness
    • Wellness on the Farm
      • Wellness on the Farm
      • Mental health resources in the Midwest
  • Espanol
  • Graphic of the Week
  • Resources
    • Datasets and Documents
    • Reporter Guides
    • Training
  • Send us a tip securely
  • We want your pitches
  • About The Center
  • Donate Now
  • More
    • About The Center
    • Board of Directors
    • User Agreement and Privacy Policy
    • Donor Transparency
    • Editorial Independence Policy
    • Contact Us
Archer Daniels Midland

ADM sells cocoa business as lawsuit on child slavery continues

By Midwest Center Staff | June 15, 2015
ShareTweet EmailPrint More
  • More on Archer Daniels Midland
  • Subscribe to Archer Daniels Midland

Archer Daniels Midland recently announced it sold its cocoa business for $1.3 billion on June 11 to Olam International Ltd, an agribusiness company with headquarters in Singapore.

Archer Daniels Midland is one of the world’s largest processors of cocoa liquor, powder and butter with eight factories from Ivory Coast to Singapore, Reuters reports.

This comes as a decade-0ld lawsuit against the agribusiness giant continues.

Archer Daniels Midland is one of three U.S. agribusiness companies facing a lawsuit regarding child labor at cocoa plantations.

Plantation workers filed the case against Archer Daniels Midland, Cargill and Nestlé in 2005 when the workers were 12 to 14 years old. The case is now headed for a final ruling in the Supreme Court.

The Epoch Times reported on June 2:

In 2005, three Malian nationals who were forced into working on cocoa plantations in the Ivory Coast filed a class-action lawsuit in a federal court in California. They claimed that the three corporations—through purchasing cocoa harvested by child laborers—”aided and abetted” slavery, child labor, and torture.

According to court documents, the three plaintiffs—identified only as John Does I, II, and III—worked without pay for up to 14 hours a day, 6 days a week. They were only fed scraps of food, and were frequently beaten and whipped by the plantation overseers.

Continue Reading

The case was originally dismissed in 2010. The ruling stated corporations could not be sued under the Alien Tort Statute, a law where non-U.S. citizens can file lawsuits in U.S. courts for violating international law.

In September 2014, the federal appeals court reversed the dismissal and found the plaintiffs had cause to argue the case because slavery is illegal. Judges ruled defendants “acted with purpose to support child slavery.”

In a 2013 interview with Bloomberg, a Cargill spokesperson said, “Cargill is concerned about the safety and well-being of children who may be involved in dangerous or forced work on cocoa farms, and we are committed to working towards a cocoa supply chain where no children are subject to these conditions.”

Thanks to our sponsors

loganfoundation mccormick foundation

Member Of

Member
  • Investigate Midwest
  • About The Center
  • Contact Us
  • Support the Midwest Center

About Investigate Midwest

The Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting is a nonprofit, online newsroom offering investigative and enterprise coverage of agribusiness,big ag and related issues through data analysis, visualizations, in-depth reports and interactive web tools. Learn More »

Search This Site

Browse Archives

© Copyright 2021, Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting

Investigate Midwest is a member of the Institute for Nonprofit News

Built with the Largo WordPress Theme from the Institute for Nonprofit News.

Back to top ↑

The Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Learn More
Privacy & Cookies Policy