A billboard promoting Monsanto in Champaign, Ill. Credit: Pam G. Dempsey / Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting

Vernon Bowmanโ€™s challenge to Monsanto Co.โ€™s patent on its Roundup Ready soybean seeds was billed as a David v. Goliath contest. Goliath won and won big.

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday that Bowman, a 75-year-old soybeans farmer from southern Indiana, had violated Monsantoโ€™s patent on its genetically engineered soybean seeds. Bowman had used commodity seeds he bought from a local grain elevator to make new seeds with Roundup Ready traits.

Justice Elena Kagan said that Monsanto would get โ€œscant benefitโ€ for its invention if farmers like Bowman could use seeds from grain elevators to make new seeds with Roundup Ready properties. Farmers would โ€œneed only buy the seed onceโ€ and could multiply the seeds โ€œad infinitum โ€” each time profiting from the patented seed without compensating its inventorโ€ฆ.

โ€œIf simple copying were a protected use, a patent would plummet in value after the first sale of the first item containing the invention,โ€ she wrote.

In Monsantoโ€™s news release, David F. Snively, executive vice president, said the decision โ€œensures that longstanding principles of patent law apply to breakthrough 21st-century technologies that are central to meeting the growing demands of our planet and its people. The ruling also provides assurance to all inventors throughout the public and private sectors that they can and should continue to investing in innovation that feeds people, improves lives, creates jobs and allows America to keep its competitive edge.โ€

Read more on the St. Louis Beacon

Type of work:

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *