Over the past few decades, the U.S. agriculture industry has been able to produce more crops despite increases in droughts, floods and other climate-related issues thanks to advances in technology.
But the effectiveness of changing agricultural methods is unlikely to keep up as the planet continues to warm, according to a new federal climate report released Friday.
“It’s not clear how far that progress can keep going,” said Don Wuebbles, a professor at the University of Illinois and one of the authors of the Fourth National Climate Assessment.
Climate change will have a major impact on agriculture, and warming temperatures are likely to disrupt global trade, exacerbate water issues, harm rural communities and decrease livestock and crop productivity, according to the report.
Overall, the Fourth National Climate Assessment, compiled by more than 300 scientists across the federal government, found that the “Earth’s climate is now changing faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization, primarily as a result of human activities.”
The average annual temperature in the contiguous United States has increased 1.8°F since the beginning of the 20th century.
In the last few decades, the agriculture industry has introduced new genetically engineered seeds to withstand drought and pests. Farmers overall have had to adapt their crops to the changing climate by adjusting when they plant crops or how they control pests and diseases in the fields.
“Up until now, we’ve done a good job of increasing production (despite a changing climate),” said Illinois State Climatologist Jim Angel, an author of the report. “But the weather is going to change so rapidly we won’t be able to keep up.”
So far, too much water has been one of the largest threats to crop production in Illinois, one of the biggest corn and soybean producing states, Angel said. In recent years, extreme rain has caused flooding in fields and increased runoff.
But in the future, Angel said that high temperatures will be the larger threat to crop production as heat is one of the major stressors on corn.
“The current state of agricultural systems in different regions of the United States is the result of continuous efforts made by farmers, ranchers, researchers, and extension specialists to identify opportunities, practices, and strategies that are viable in different climates,” the report said. “However, any change in the climate poses a major challenge to agriculture through increased rates of crop failure, reduced livestock productivity, and altered rates of pressure from pests, weeds and diseases.”
Agriculture- and food-related sectors contribute almost $1 trillion (about 5.5 percent of total GDP) to the U.S. economy, including 24 million jobs, making up 12.5 percent of all U.S. employment, according to the assessment.
Continuous advancements will be needed to help the U.S. agriculture industry adapt to the changes, the report said.
Wuebbles, who served as lead climate scientist in the Obama administration, found there could be as much as a 50 percent reduction in corn production by mid-century.
The assessment found that over the next three decades, crop yields are projected to decline to the levels of the 1980s because of an increase in temperatures, extreme rain events and incidents of drought.
Nationwide, in 1984, corn yields averaged 106 bushels an acre. In 2017, corn yields average 176 bushels an acre, according to data from the USDA.
This will especially hit the Midwest as corn and soybeans make up 75 percent of crops grown.
“I’m very concerned about the farmers. This, coupled with concerns about the increase in population that’s still going on.” Wuebbles said. “The intent of Midwest agricultural leaders is that they can feed the world. It’s going to be very, very difficult under a changing climate.”
The impacts are expected to cause human health issues and overall decreases in the U.S. economy by the end of the century. The overall changes are impossible to project, largely because it depends on how much action is taken to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
The assessment found that, as the globe warms, everything from where crops are grown and how much water is available for irrigation to environmental stress on livestock and the complex international trade system will shift.
“Greenhouse gas emissions from human activities are the only factor that can account for the observed warming over the last century; there are no credible alternative human or natural explanations supported by the observational evidence,” the report said. “Without human activities, the influence of natural factors alone would actually have had a slight cooling effect on global climate over the last 50 years.”
Genetically engineered crops
Genetically engineered crops have driven the increases in crop productivity over the past few decades, the report said.
“The expected demand for higher crop productivity and anticipated climate change stresses have driven advancements in crop genetics,” the report said. “Seed companies have released numerous crop varieties that are tolerant to heat, drought, or pests and diseases. This trend is expected to continue as new crop varieties are developed to adapt to a changing climate.”
However, the private sector likely won’t be able to even keep yields where they are today without public help, the report said.
The federal government will likely need to invest in genetic engineering and help potential progress navigate issues like intellectual property rights and limitations to access of genetic resources, the report said.
“Investments by commercial firms alone are unlikely to be sufficient to maintain (genetic) resources, meaning higher levels of public investment would be needed for genetic resource conservation, characterization, and use,” the report said.
The report also expressed a need for genetic engineering for crops outside of major commodity crops, like corn and soybeans.
“Considerable private- and public-sector research is focused on the genetic improvement of crops to enhance resilience under climate stress,” the report said. “However, most of the research has focused on a few major species, with minimal public resources invested in genetic improvement of specialty crops. Additionally, these efforts have focused largely on yield and much less on quality improvements that have significant nutritional and economic implications.”
Angel said the Corn Belt is currently shifting and southern parts of Illinois and Missouri are already getting too warm to effectively grow corn.
Food security, change and international trade
Already, many countries are experiencing rapid price increases for food because of unpredictable weather and more frequent weather extremes, the report said.
“For example, droughts around the world in 2010 contributed to a doubling of global wheat prices in 2011 and a tripling of bread prices in Egypt,” the report said. “This and other factors, including national trade policy and poverty, contributed to the civil unrest that ultimately resulted in the 2011 Egyptian revolution. While the 2010 droughts were not the sole cause of the revolution, they contributed to destabilization of an already unstable region.”
Across the globe, the uncertainties created by changing temperature and precipitation will alter food prices, trade markets and production and consumption patterns, the report said.
Whether growers can adapt will determine the extent of those uncertainties.
“Risks associated with climate changes depend on the rate and severity of the changes and the ability of producers to adapt to changes,” the report said.
The report found that food security will likely become an even greater challenge as the climate changes and global populations increase to 9.8 billion by 2050.
“The United States is a major exporter of agricultural commodities, and a disruption in its agricultural production will affect the agricultural sector on a global scale,” the report said.
The report said that disruptions to trade, through extreme weather events, might also impact the U.S. agriculture industry.
“In addition to local impacts on U.S.-owned assets abroad, climate change is expected to lead to large-scale shifts in the availability and prices of many agricultural products across the world, with corresponding impacts on U.S. agricultural producers and the U.S. economy,” the report said.
This will likely have an outsized effect on rural communities.
“Rural communities, where economies are more tightly interconnected with agriculture than with other sectors, are particularly vulnerable to the agricultural volatility related to climate,” the report said.
This includes migrant workers, who often work outside and will face more stress due to higher temperatures.
“Migrant workers, who provide much of the agricultural labor in some regions and some enterprises, are particularly vulnerable (to human health concerns),” the report said.
Angel said that he is especially concerned about migrant workers, as they work outside but also live in housing that often isn’t air-conditioned. Those concerns extend to other agricultural workers, he said.
“Air quality might be as much of a problem in rural communities as urban areas,” he said.
Climate change is also likely to affect livestock and poultry, which together account for over half of U.S. agricultural cash receipts.
“Projected increases in daily maximum temperatures and heat waves will lead to further heat stress for livestock, although the severity of consequences will vary by region,” the report said.
The issues that livestock face include degraded pasture and range areas, but also effects to the animals, including reducing reproductive efficiency, the report said.
“Temperatures beyond the optimal range alter the physiological functions of animals, resulting in changes in respiration rate, heart rate, blood chemistry, hormones, and metabolism; such temperatures generally result in behavioral changes as well, such as increased intake of water and reduced feed intake,” the report said.
That means livestock production will either have to move to other climates or producers will have to adapt their operations with “long-term investments such as climate-controlled buildings, portable or permanent shading structures, and planted trees, as well as short-term production strategies such as altering feeds.”
Changing precipitation trends will likely lead to an array of issues, including an increase in irrigation in some areas, an inability to irrigate because of water shortage issues, soil degradation and water quality issues, the report said. The impact depends on where farmers are.
Increasing precipitation will likely lead to more runoff, harming soil and leading to more eutrophication, or nutrient overloads, due to fertilizers being washed away, the report said.
That will likely lead to water quality issues for water treatment plants, but also to more hypoxia, or dead zones, like that in the Gulf of Mexico.
Angel said that already the Midwest is seeing issues with runoff and nitrates, and that will only increase.
“Especially with the increase in heavy rain events,” Angel said.
Overall, from 1960 to 2008, the incidences of hypoxia in the United States increased by a factor of 30, the report said.
“Projections for hypoxia indicate a worsening trend, with increased frequency, intensity, and duration of hypoxic episodes,” the report said.
The Ogallala Aquifer, which makes up parts of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska and Colorado, is already seeing unsustainable levels of groundwater depletion because of agricultural irrigation.
“Irrigated agriculture uses more than 95% of the groundwater extracted from the Ogallala Aquifer, and the economy of the region depends almost entirely on irrigated agriculture,” the report said. “Overlying states produce one-fifth of the Nation’s wheat, corn, and cotton, and the southern half of the region accounts for more than one-third of the beef cattle production.”
Current levels of extraction are already too high, and more water will be needed as drought increases, the report said. Increasingly, the area has seen dust storms like those of the 1930s Dust Bowl.
Some progress has been made, but climate change will increase the stress on the aquifer.
“Recent advances in precision irrigation technologies, improved understanding of the impacts of different dryland and irrigation management strategies on crop productivity, and the adoption of weather-based irrigation scheduling tools as well as drought-tolerant crop varieties have increased the ability to cope with projected heat stress and drought conditions under climate change,” the report said.
Angel said he expects irrigation to increase in parts of Illinois, though it only exists in areas with high-value crops like seed corns now. He said increasing irrigation comes with its own issues, including energy cost and affects on water supplies.
“It’s not a free lunch,” Angel said. “You have to do it enough to pay those systems off.”